Reconceptualizing Literary Theory Pedagogy: Bridging Abstract Epistemology and Contextual Interpretation

  • Atiq Aqiqotul Hasanah Department of the Faculty of Letters and Culture, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, Indonesia.
  • Hassanuddin Fatsah Department of the Faculty of Letters and Culture, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, Indonesia.
  • Harto S. Malik Department of the Faculty of Letters and Culture, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, Indonesia.
  • Ellyana Hinta Department of the Faculty of Letters and Culture, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, Indonesia.
Keywords: Literary theory pedagogy, Problem-Based Learning, interpretative analysis, digital learning, epistemic mediation, humanities education, higher education

Abstract

This study investigates the gap between students’ conceptual understanding of literary theory and their ability to apply theoretical frameworks in textual analysis in higher education. The research was conducted among students enrolled in a literary theory course at Universitas Muhammadiyah Gorontalo. It aims to reconceptualize literary theory pedagogy by integrating interpretative practice, collaborative learning, and digital mediation. This study employed a qualitative classroom-based research design through the implementation of a Problem-Based Learning (PBL) model integrated with an e-learning platform. Data were collected through classroom observations, student discussion records, reflective writings, and analysis of students’ interpretative assignments. The findings indicate that conventional lecture-centered approaches tend to present literary theory as abstract and declarative knowledge, which results in fragmented theoretical understanding and limited metatheoretical awareness among students. When learning activities were reorganized around interpretative problems derived from literary texts, students began to engage with theory as an analytical tool rather than as a static conceptual system. Collaborative discussions and peer feedback encouraged dialogic interpretation, while digital learning platforms extended reflective engagement beyond classroom time and enabled students to revise their analytical arguments. The study shows that integrating Problem-Based Learning with e-learning environments fosters a more reflective and contextual learning process, transforming literary theory into a practical framework for critical interpretation in higher education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ballard, S. (n.d.). Know-about, know-that, know-how: A model for moving between theory and design practice. University of Washington. https://digital.lib.washington.edu/bitstreams/aad1e528-a9e8-448a-af0b-7a0010b7406b/download

Benwell, B., Procter, J., & Robinson, G. (2012). Postcolonial audiences: Readers, viewers and reception. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203126165

Chan, C. K. Y., & Wong, H. Y. H. (2025). Assessing the ability of generative AI in English literary analysis through Bloom’s taxonomy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10791-025-09572-8

Chen, J. (2012). The great importance of the distinction between declarative and procedural knowledge. Acta Psychologica, 19(4), 559-566. https://doi.org/10.14417/AP.387

Chiramba, O., & Motala, S. (2023). Towards transforming teaching and learning in higher education: Interrogating poverty through a decolonial perspective. Curriculum Perspectives, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-023-00188-w

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage.

D’haen, T. (2024). Geopolitics and world literature. In Encyclopedia of world literature. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25399-7_32-1

Hassad, R. A. (2010). Reflection on training, experience, and introductory statistics: A mini-survey of tertiary level statistics instructors. https://arxiv.org/abs/1007.3205

Hidayat, R., & Susanto, F. (2020). Developing multi-literacy skills by creating graphic story in literature class: A project-based learning approach. International Journal of Language Teaching and Education, 4(2), 83-95. https://doi.org/10.22437/IJOLTE.V4I2.12049

Ilma, S., Al Muhdhar, M. H. I., Rohman, F., & Sari, M. S. (2022). Promoting students’ metacognitive awareness and cognitive learning outcomes in science education. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 11(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i1.22083

Lin, J. (2023). International politics of Western literary theory: Literary theory as doctrine and as discipline. Cultural and Religious Studies. https://doi.org/10.17265/2328-2177/2023.11.001

Memon, M. A., Ramayah, T., Ting, H., & Cheah, J. (2024). Purposive sampling: A review and guidelines for quantitative research. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modelling, 9(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.47263/jasem.9(1)01

Paulus, T. M. (2003). Collaboration and the social construction of knowledge in an online learning environment (Doctoral dissertation). ProQuest.

Pietzner, J. (n.d.). Expanding their horizons: Hermeneutic practices and literary interpretation. https://www.academia.edu/download/102538230/162213113.pdf

Ramli, R., Razali, R., Gadeng, A. N., Diana, N., & Hariadi, J. (2025). Integrating local knowledge into higher education: A qualitative study of curriculum innovation in Aceh, Indonesia. Education Sciences, 15(9), 1214. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15091214

Ratuva, S. (2021). Social indexology, neoliberalism and racialised metrics: Legitimising the ‘inferiority’ of Global South countries. Third World Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2021.1913406

Sangwa, S., Butera, A., & Mutabazi, P. (2025). Digital transformation of higher education: A post-COVID review of adoption, quality assurance, and governance challenges. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5368756

Storm, S. (2025). Youth are literary scholars: What tracing aesthetic practices and interpretive scales suggests for disciplinary literacy in English language arts. Reading Research Quarterly, 60(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.70029

Suryana, E., Aprina, M. P., & Harto, K. (2022). Teori konstruktivistik dan implikasinya dalam pembelajaran. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(7), 2070-2080. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v5i7.666

Tsang, G. (n.d.). Deconstructing the cradle of literature: An application of Pierre Bourdieu’s “field” theory to the studies of literary subjectivity and local creative writing. https://repository.rit.edu/jcws/vol10/iss1/3

Unsriana, L., Perdana, B., & Ariana, S. (n.d.). Smart e-learning systems for Japanese literature education in an Industry 4.0 perspective. https://att.aptisi.or.id/index.php/att/article/view/690

Wang, S. (2022). Critical thinking development through project-based learning. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13(5), 1007-1013. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1305.13

Wang, X., & Chen, H. (2024). Exploration of outcome-oriented situated knowledge co-construction in classroom teaching design. https://doi.org/10.33422/eduglobalconf.v1i1.292

Zembylas, M. (2021). The affective dimension of everyday resistance: Implications for critical pedagogy in engaging with neoliberalism’s educational impact. Critical Studies in Education, 62(2), 211-226. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2019.1617180

Published
2026-03-31
How to Cite
Hasanah, A. A., Fatsah, H., Malik, H. S., & Hinta, E. (2026). Reconceptualizing Literary Theory Pedagogy: Bridging Abstract Epistemology and Contextual Interpretation. Randwick International of Education and Linguistics Science Journal, 7(1), 16-33. https://doi.org/10.47175/rielsj.v7i1.1283