Learning Style Profiles and Adaptive Teaching Needs in EFL Higher Education: A Felder–Silverman-Based Mixed-Methods Study
Abstract
This study investigates the learning style profiles of EFL undergraduate students and the relationship between these profiles and the necessity of adaptive teaching in higher education. The study builds on the understanding that students respond differently to instructional input, while classroom teaching continues to be delivered through a fairly homogenous approach. This study used the Felder–Silverman Learning Style Model as the analytical framework to identify students’ learning style tendencies and to analyse the perceptions of the lecturers and students on the need of adaptive teaching. To gain a broader understanding of the issue, a convergent mix-methods design was employed. Quantitative data were collected from 98 students, using the Index of Learning Styles and an adaptive teaching needs questionnaire. 11 lecturers filled in a similar needs questionnaire. Qualitative data were gathered through structured interviews with selected lecturers and students. The questionnaire data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, whereas the interview data were examined thematically and integrated during the interpretation stage. The findings revealed that active, sensing, visual, and sequential tendencies were the most dominant among the students. However, the presence of reflective, intuitive, verbal, and global learners indicates that instruction should remain flexible and varied rather than being guided by fixed learning-style labels. Both lecturers and students reported strong needs for adaptive teaching, especially in relation to learner profile data, varied instructional strategies, multimodal resources, flexible learning activities, adaptive assessment, remedial support, and enrichment. The study concludes that learning style profiles are most useful as diagnostic information for supporting inclusive, responsive, and adaptable EFL instruction.
Downloads
References
Alajlani, N., & Crabb, M. (2025). Adaptive teaching in higher education: Real-time design patterns for educator-led instruction. Journal of Computing in Higher Education.
Bach, K. M., Hofer, S. I., & Bichler, S. (2025). Adaptive learning , instruction , and teaching in schools : Unraveling context , sources , implementation , and goals in a systematic review ☆. Learning and Individual Differences, 124(September), 102781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102781
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology,. 3(2), 77–101.
Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004). Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: A systematic and critical review. Learning and Skills Research Centre.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Du Plooy, E., Casteleijn, D., & Franzsen, D. (2024). Personalized adaptive learning in higher education : A scoping review of key characteristics and impact on academic performance and engagement. Heliyon, 10(21), e39630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39630
Ezzaim, A., Dahbi, A., Aqqal, A., & Haidine, A. (2025). AI-based learning style detection in adaptive learning systems: A systematic literature review. Journal of Computers in Education, 12., 731–769. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-024-00328-9
Felder, R, M & Silverman, L, K. (1988). Learning and Teaching Styles In Engineering Education. Engr. Education, 78(7), 674–68.
Felder, R. M., & Henriques, E. R. (1995). Learning and Teaching Styles In Foreign and Second Language Education. 1, 21–31.
Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2019). Educational Reserach: Competenciesfor Analysis and applications. Twelfth edition. Pearson.
Gayathri, G., Begam, M. F., & Aashika, G. (2023). Machine learning based learning style detection using Felder-Silverman framework. IEEE, 1–7.
Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 9(3), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038.x
Soloman, B. A. &, & Felder, R. M. (1999). Index of Learning Styles Questionnaire. January 1999.
UNESCO. (2025). UNESCO convenes global leaders at Digital Learning Week 2025 to shape inclusive, human-centered futures for AI in education.
Copyright (c) 2026 Randwick International of Education and Linguistics Science Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






















