Deconstruction and Reconstruction of Femininity in Macbeth from the Perspective of Androgyny
Abstract
Woolf’s theory of the "androgynous mind," Freud’s concept of "repetition compulsion," and Foucault’s theory of disciplinary power together illuminate the deeper causes of Lady Macbeth’s tragic fate in Macbeth. In her attempt to transcend traditional gender roles, Lady Macbeth represses her feminine ethical traits and excessively amplifies masculine qualities such as cruelty and decisiveness. This imbalance in gender characteristics leads to intense inner conflict. At the same time, the internalization of social disciplinary power infiltrates her thoughts and behaviors, distorting her understanding of power and identity. As a result, she becomes both a replication of patriarchal logic and a victim of psychological collapse due to her inability to escape gender constraints. The interplay between psychological structure and social discipline reveals the multilayered roots of her tragedy, offering a new theoretical perspective for gender criticism of Shakespeare’s female characters.
Downloads
References
Beauvoir, S. de. (1943). Le deuxième sexe. Paris: Gallimard.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York, NY: Routledge.
Chen, X. (1995). Feminist criticism and Shakespeare studies. Foreign Literature
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
Freud, S. (1920). Beyond the pleasure principle. London, UK: Hogarth Press.
Rosenman, E. B. (1986). Sexual identity and A Room of One’s Own: “Secret economies” in Virginia Woolf’s feminism. Modern Fiction Studies, 32(3), 415–434.
Shakespeare, W. (1606). The tragedy of Macbeth. Modern Library
Woolf, V. (1929). A room of one’s own. New York, NY: Harcourt, Inc.
Zhang, H. (2019). Transgressive women: A cultural interpretation of the gender characteristics of Shakespeare's tragic characters. Dramatic Art, (2), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.13737/j.cnki.ta.2019.02.007
Copyright (c) 2025 Randwick International of Social Science Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




















